The case for and against AGI by 2030 (article by Benjamin Todd)

The case for and against AGI by 2030 (article by Benjamin Todd)

More and more people have been saying that we might have AGI (artificial general intelligence) before 2030. Is that really plausible?

This article by Benjamin Todd looks into the cases for and against, and summarises the key things you need to know to understand the debate. You can see all the images and many footnotes in the original article on the 80,000 Hours website.

In a nutshell:

  • Four key factors are driving AI progress: larger base models, teaching models to reason, increasing models’ thinking time, and building agent scaffolding for multi-step tasks. These are underpinned by increasing computational power to run and train AI systems, as well as increasing human capital going into algorithmic research.
  • All of these drivers are set to continue until 2028 and perhaps until 2032.
  • This means we should expect major further gains in AI performance. We don’t know how large they’ll be, but extrapolating recent trends on benchmarks suggests we’ll reach systems with beyond-human performance in coding and scientific reasoning, and that can autonomously complete multi-week projects.
  • Whether we call these systems ’AGI’ or not, they could be sufficient to enable AI research itself, robotics, the technology industry, and scientific research to accelerate — leading to transformative impacts.
  • Alternatively, AI might fail to overcome issues with ill-defined, high-context work over long time horizons and remain a tool (even if much improved compared to today).
  • Increasing AI performance requires exponential growth in investment and the research workforce. At current rates, we will likely start to reach bottlenecks around 2030. Simplifying a bit, that means we’ll likely either reach AGI by around 2030 or see progress slow significantly. Hybrid scenarios are also possible, but the next five years seem especially crucial.

Chapters:

  • Introduction (00:00:00)
  • The case for AGI by 2030 (00:00:33)
  • The article in a nutshell (00:04:04)
  • Section 1: What's driven recent AI progress? (00:05:46)
  • How we got here: the deep learning era (00:05:52)
  • Where are we now: the four key drivers (00:07:45)
  • Driver 1: Scaling pretraining (00:08:57)
  • Algorithmic efficiency (00:12:14)
  • How much further can pretraining scale? (00:14:22)
  • Driver 2: Training the models to reason (00:16:15)
  • How far can scaling reasoning continue? (00:22:06)
  • Driver 3: Increasing how long models think (00:25:01)
  • Driver 4: Building better agents (00:28:00)
  • How far can agent improvements continue? (00:33:40)
  • Section 2: How good will AI become by 2030? (00:35:59)
  • Trend extrapolation of AI capabilities (00:37:42)
  • What jobs would these systems help with? (00:39:59)
  • Software engineering (00:40:50)
  • Scientific research (00:42:13)
  • AI research (00:43:21)
  • What's the case against this? (00:44:30)
  • Additional resources on the sceptical view (00:49:18)
  • When do the 'experts' expect AGI? (00:49:50)
  • Section 3: Why the next 5 years are crucial (00:51:06)
  • Bottlenecks around 2030 (00:52:10)
  • Two potential futures for AI (00:56:02)
  • Conclusion (00:58:05)
  • Thanks for listening (00:59:27)

Audio engineering: Dominic Armstrong
Music: Ben Cordell

Tämä jakso on lisätty Podme-palveluun avoimen RSS-syötteen kautta eikä se ole Podmen omaa tuotantoa. Siksi jakso saattaa sisältää mainontaa.

Jaksot(358)

OpenAI Security: Controlling Models is Now ‘Hell’ (AI Explained cross-post)

OpenAI Security: Controlling Models is Now ‘Hell’ (AI Explained cross-post)

This is an (unpaid) cross-post of a video from the podcast 'AI Explained', which Rob Wiblin thought you might be interested in.You can find the original on YouTube here. If you like it and want more s...

9 Loka 40min

In 2023 Ajeya Cotra already knew what was coming (classic episode)

In 2023 Ajeya Cotra already knew what was coming (classic episode)

We're rereleasing some of older episodes that seem more relevant than ever with new rogue AI incidents now seemingly announced every day. Ajeya was one of three independent investigators into the Hugg...

8 Loka 2h 46min

19 Astra and 'Hugging Face' details that reveal what's coming next | Rob Wiblin

19 Astra and 'Hugging Face' details that reveal what's coming next | Rob Wiblin

OpenAI’s rogue agent swarm was eventually caught hacking Hugging Face for a simple reason: it wasn’t trying to hide from us at all. What could a swarm that wants to stay hidden get away with?Host Rob ...

2 Loka 20min

The case for giving AI (some) legal rights | Simon Goldstein

The case for giving AI (some) legal rights | Simon Goldstein

It sounds like the worst idea in the world: pay AIs, let them own property, give them rights. But AI ethics and safety researcher Simon Goldstein thinks it might actually be the best way to keep human...

1 Loka 1h 53min

Will AI take power — or will humans use it to take power first? With Katja Grace and Tom Davidson

Will AI take power — or will humans use it to take power first? With Katja Grace and Tom Davidson

In our first-ever debate, we asked two leading AI risk researchers which catastrophe we should fear most: misaligned AI seizing control from humans, or a small group of humans using AI to seize power....

29 Syys 1h 28min

How we get from AI cyberattacks to human extinction

How we get from AI cyberattacks to human extinction

You’ve seen the headlines: AI could kill us all. Think it sounds ridiculous? So did host Luisa Rodriguez, until she tried to pick apart the arguments. She starts with the motive: why would AI ‘want’ t...

24 Syys 27min

#254 – Max Nadeau on why ambitious people should start AI safety nonprofits

#254 – Max Nadeau on why ambitious people should start AI safety nonprofits

There are millions available for anyone who can launch a successful nonprofit AI safety startup. The hard part, it turns out, is finding people to take the money. Coefficient Giving has drawn up a lis...

17 Syys 1h 3min

Why the intelligence explosion can't happen inside a data centre | Tom Reed

Why the intelligence explosion can't happen inside a data centre | Tom Reed

AI systems are starting to build themselves. Because each generation of model will be better at building its successor than the last, it seems plausible that the full automation of AI R&D could rapidl...

10 Syys 22min

Suosittua kategoriassa Koulutus

rss-murhan-anatomia
aamukahvilla
psykopodiaa-podcast
voi-hyvin-meditaatiot-2
psykologia
rss-narsisti
rss-rahamania
rss-arkea-ja-aurinkoa-podcast-espanjasta
rss-liian-kuuma-peruna
kesken
aloita-meditaatio
rss-hereilla
ilona-rauhala
rss-niinku-asia-on
ihminen-tavattavissa-tommy-hellsten-instituutti
rss-luonnollinen-synnytys-podcast
rss-oispa-viinii
rss-elama-jota-rakastat
rahapuhetta
rss-koira-haudattuna