Mega Edition:  Judge Kaplan Blasts Prince Andrew And His Legal Team (7/18/26)

Mega Edition: Judge Kaplan Blasts Prince Andrew And His Legal Team (7/18/26)

Judge Lewis Kaplan made it clear early in Virginia Giuffre’s civil lawsuit that he would not allow Prince Andrew’s attorneys to bury the case beneath procedural disputes or use technical arguments to postpone confronting the allegations. When Andrew’s legal team challenged whether he had been properly served with the lawsuit, Kaplan authorized Giuffre to deliver the papers through Andrew’s American attorneys and pushed the parties toward addressing the substance of the case. The judge indicated that the litigation should not be made unnecessarily complicated, rejecting the idea that disputes over international service rules should be permitted to stall the proceedings indefinitely. Andrew’s lawyers had argued that formal service had to proceed through British legal channels, while Giuffre’s attorneys accused the prince of avoiding service and playing a prolonged game of procedural hide-and-seek. Kaplan’s rulings removed that obstacle and established that Andrew would have to respond rather than continue contesting how the papers reached him.

Kaplan showed the same impatience when Andrew’s attorneys later attempted to dismiss the lawsuit through a series of legal technicalities, including Giuffre’s residency, the constitutionality of New York’s Child Victims Act and the wording of her earlier settlement with Jeffrey Epstein. During oral arguments, Kaplan directly cut off claims that Giuffre had failed to include enough factual detail in her complaint, telling Andrew’s lawyer that she had no obligation to provide that level of specificity at the pleading stage and that dismissal on that basis was “not going to happen.” He ultimately denied Andrew’s motion to dismiss in all respects, finding that the Epstein settlement was too ambiguous to clearly release Andrew from liability and allowing discovery to proceed. The message was unmistakable: Andrew’s legal team was entitled to mount a defense, but procedure would not be transformed into a mechanism for endlessly delaying Giuffre’s opportunity to have her claims heard.


to contact me:


bobbycapucci@protonmail.com

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.

Denne episoden er hentet fra en åpen RSS-feed og er ikke publisert av Podme. Den kan derfor inneholde annonser.

Episoder(1000)

Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing Transcripts (Day 3 Part 1) (10/2/26)

Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing Transcripts (Day 3 Part 1) (10/2/26)

Day three of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused largely on what happened after Robinson turned himself in following the killing of Charlie Kirk. Utah State Bureau of Investigation agent Bria...

3 Okt 11min

Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing Transcripts (Day 2 Part 19) (9/30/26)

Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing Transcripts (Day 2 Part 19) (9/30/26)

Day two of Tyler Robinson’s preliminary hearing focused heavily on prosecutors’ effort to connect Robinson to the Utah Valley University campus and to the physical evidence recovered after Charlie Kir...

2 Okt 24min

Federal Judge Orders DOJ to Expedite Epstein FOIA Requests (Part 2) (10/1/26)

Federal Judge Orders DOJ to Expedite Epstein FOIA Requests (Part 2) (10/1/26)

Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ruled that the Justice Department must expedite processing of most of Democracy Defenders Fund’s FOIA requests concerning Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and DOJ’s hand...

2 Okt 10min

Federal Judge Orders DOJ to Expedite Epstein FOIA Requests (Part 1) (10/2/26)

Federal Judge Orders DOJ to Expedite Epstein FOIA Requests (Part 1) (10/2/26)

Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly ruled that the Justice Department must expedite processing of most of Democracy Defenders Fund’s FOIA requests concerning Jeffrey Epstein, Ghislaine Maxwell and DOJ’s hand...

2 Okt 13min

The Epstein Witnesses Had Their Say. Now Compare It to the Evidence (Part 2) (10/2/26)

The Epstein Witnesses Had Their Say. Now Compare It to the Evidence (Part 2) (10/2/26)

Now that Congress has taken testimony from figures including Darren Indyke, Richard Kahn, Kathryn Ruemmler, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff and Tova Noel, the real investigative work should be beginning, n...

2 Okt 21min

The Epstein Witnesses Had Their Say. Now Compare It to the Evidence (Part 1) (10/2/26)

The Epstein Witnesses Had Their Say. Now Compare It to the Evidence (Part 1) (10/2/26)

Now that Congress has taken testimony from figures including Darren Indyke, Richard Kahn, Kathryn Ruemmler, Sarah Kellen, Lesley Groff and Tova Noel, the real investigative work should be beginning, n...

2 Okt 11min

Jane Doe # 3 And Her Unredacted Motion For Anonymity Against Indyke, Kahn And The Epstein Estate (10/2/26)

Jane Doe # 3 And Her Unredacted Motion For Anonymity Against Indyke, Kahn And The Epstein Estate (10/2/26)

Jane Doe 3 asked the federal court to allow her to continue using a pseudonym in her lawsuits against Darren Indyke and Richard Kahn, including the related action in which they are sued as co-executor...

2 Okt 11min

Mega Edition:  The State Of Idaho And Their Confidence In The Case Against Kohberger (10/2/26)

Mega Edition: The State Of Idaho And Their Confidence In The Case Against Kohberger (10/2/26)

Leading up to Bryan Kohberger’s guilty plea, Idaho prosecutors believed they had assembled a strong circumstantial and forensic case tying him to the murders of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana K...

2 Okt 44min

Populært innen Politikk og nyheter

giver-og-gjengen-vg
aftenpodden
aftenpodden-usa
forklart
popradet
fotballpodden-2
stopp-verden
saken
dine-penger-pengeradet
rss-espen-lee-usensurert
det-store-bildet
rss-gukild-johaug
nokon-ma-ga
hanna-de-heldige
rss-ness
aftenbla-bla
bt-dokumentar-2
rss-penger-polser-og-politikk
e24-podden
frokostshowet-pa-p5