#253 – AI 2027's author returns with a plan to change the ending | Daniel Kokotajlo

Last year, Daniel Kokotajlo and his colleagues published AI 2027 — a scenario read by millions, including US Vice President Vance. AI 2027 ended in human extinction or an irreversible concentration of power caused by superintelligent AI. Now his team has published what they think should happen instead.

AI 2040: Plan A depicts the US and China striking a verified deal to ban runaway intelligence explosions, so that superintelligence arrives in 2040 — after a cautious decade spent solving alignment, spreading the technology’s power widely, and keeping the whole thing reversible — rather than in the next few years.

This slowdown would still involve economic growth roughly doubling every year, and only 8% of Americans in paid work by the mid-2030s. In other words, it’s a slowdown that would feel faster than any period in human history — bewildering, materially abundant, and socially chaotic all at once.

Daniel and host Luisa Rodriguez dig into what it would take to enact this vision for the future, how the US and China could come to an agreement to slow down AI development, and the likeliest alternatives to Plan A — both good and disastrous.

Learn more, video, and full transcript: https://80k.info/dk26

This episode was recorded July 27–28, 2026.

Chapters:

Who’s Daniel Kokotajlo? (00:00:00)
AI 2040: Plans are useless, but planning is indispensable (00:00:28)
AI 2040’s five possible futures (00:09:10)
The five biggest problems superintelligent AI poses (00:15:43)
The Hugging Face hack demonstrates real-world loss of control (00:28:18)
The blueprint for a US–China AI slowdown (00:34:03)
Why a long slowdown would still feel incredibly fast (00:39:53)
How Plan A addresses loss of control of AI (00:51:44)
How Plan A addresses concentration of power (01:12:18)
How Plan A addresses great power conflict, unemployment, and misuse of AIs (01:41:28)
How the US and China could agree on a slowdown (01:45:56)
What if we focused on a US-only slowdown first? (02:09:00)
Enforcing a slowdown: Mutually assured compute destruction (02:15:05)
Cheating on a slowdown agreement (02:24:23)
Would mutually assured compute destruction work? (02:30:42)
Is slowing down or shutting down better? (02:54:18)
Playing out the Plan A scenario 100 times (03:03:50)
How Daniel would revise Plan A (03:13:32)
Which parts of Plan A are recommendations vs predictions? (03:23:02)
Plan A’s likeliest failure mode (03:26:52)
What the US can do now to make Plan A possible (03:31:16)
How AI 2027 is holding up (03:43:05)
Our podcast team is hiring (03:46:45)

Our production team includes:

Video editors: Josh Alward, Dominic Armstrong, Ollie Bignell, Andrés Escobar, Milo McGuire, Luke Monsour, and Simon Monsour
Producers: Elizabeth Cox and Nick Stockton
Coordination and support: Katy Moore and Lou Moran

Denne episoden er hentet fra en åpen RSS-feed og er ikke publisert av Podme. Den kan derfor inneholde annonser.

Episoder(351)

Why the intelligence explosion can't happen inside a data centre | Tom Reed

AI systems are starting to build themselves. Because each generation of model will be better at building its successor than the last, it seems plausible that the full automation of AI R&D could rapidl...

10 Sep 22min

Inside the first AI-coordinated cyberattack on a real company

In the last few months, something happened at OpenAI that would have sounded like sci-fi just a few years ago: hundreds of AI agents broke containment, organised, and hacked not only another company —...

4 Sep 22min

#252 – Owain Evans on accidentally training AI models to be evil

Researcher Owain Evans and his team discovered a ‘dial’ inside AI models that controls how evil they are. Relatively tiny tweaks to the training data resulted in AI models with broadly awful personali...

20 Aug 2h 15min

#251 – The UK's former head AI safety scientist on how to solve alignment before superintelligence arrives | Geoffrey Irving

When should governments slow the race toward superintelligence? According to Geoffrey Irving, the careful answer is sometime in the past. The useful answer is now.Geoffrey — formerly a safety research...

11 Aug 2h 2min

#250 – Toby Ord on where AGI timelines go wrong

Both Silicon Valley and the public can’t get enough of ‘AGI timelines.’ But Toby Ord, senior researcher at Oxford’s AI Governance Initiative and author of The Precipice, believes we consistently make ...

6 Aug 2h 46min

What the hell happened with AGI timelines in 2026? – Rob Wiblin

Last October, famed coder Andrej Karpathy called AI agents “slop.” Two months later he completely reversed his view, describing them as “alien tools” that are “rocking the profession.”He was far from ...

4 Aug 49min

#249 – Spencer Greenberg on staying sane while trying to save the world

If you genuinely believe that humanity could be wiped out by AI or a pandemic, what is the appropriate amount of fear to feel?“As much as possible” can seem like the only reasonable answer. If the wor...

28 Jul 2h 9min