Murder In Moscow: Bryan Kohberger's Motion In Limine To Exclude Amazon Clicks

In Case Number CR01-24-31665, Motion in Limine #9 seeks to exclude evidence related to Amazon click activity from being presented at trial. The defense argues that the Amazon browsing history, purchase records, or any click activity are irrelevant, prejudicial, and lack proper authentication as definitive proof of the defendant’s intent or actions. They contend that the click activity does not directly establish a connection to the alleged crime, as multiple individuals could have accessed the account or device. Furthermore, the defense asserts that allowing such evidence could mislead the jury into drawing speculative conclusions, particularly if the data lacks clear attribution to the defendant’s personal actions.

The motion also raises concerns about the reliability and admissibility of digital evidence, questioning whether proper forensic procedures were followed in retrieving and analyzing the Amazon activity logs. The defense argues that without concrete proof of the defendant personally conducting the searches or purchases, the evidence should be deemed inadmissible under evidentiary rules prohibiting undue prejudice and speculation. Additionally, they highlight the potential for false assumptions, as online browsing does not necessarily indicate criminal intent. The motion urges the court to prevent the prosecution from introducing Amazon click activity at trial, arguing that its inclusion would create an unfair bias against the defendant without definitive proof of its relevance to the charges.


to contact me:

bobbycapucci@protonmail.com



source:

022425-Defense-Motion-inLimine-9-RE-Excluding-Amazon-Click-Activity-Evidence.pdf

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-moscow-murders-and-more--5852883/support.