Daniel Schmachtenberger: "Bend Not Break Part 1: Energy Blindness"

Daniel Schmachtenberger: "Bend Not Break Part 1: Energy Blindness"

On this episode we meet with founding member of The Consilience Project, Daniel Schmachtenberger.

In the first of a five-part series, Nate and Daniel outline the macro risks and pathways for civilization to 'bend' and avoid 'breaking' in coming decades.

In the Part 1 of 5 conversation, Schmachtenberger flips the script to interview Nate about the urgent problems his research and work on energy, money, and growth confront. Nate explains how we can come to understand energy blindness and the overlooked role of oil in consumption, production, and progress since the Industrial Revolution. The dominant narrative of human progress prioritizes capital and labor — but the omission of energy and materials leaves out a key component to understanding how the modern human ecosystem functions.

Further, Nate discusses how a growth economy will inevitably lead to increased energy production and consumption, and how new energy technologies like renewables end up creating more energy output, not less. Putting everything together, in outsourcing our decisions and planning to a market dependent on growth, we have not so metaphorically become an energy hungry superorganism.

Finally, Daniel and Nate look forward to answering: What are ways for us to prepare for a post-growth economy? How can we stay balanced in the face of existential crises? What type of policy can help shape a future that is yet to arrive, and how can we get ahead?

About Daniel Schmachtenberger

Daniel Schmachtenberger is a founding member of The Consilience Project, aimed at improving public sensemaking and dialogue.

The throughline of his interests has to do with ways of improving the health and development of individuals and society, with a virtuous relationship between the two as a goal.

Towards these ends, he's had particular interest in the topics of catastrophic and existential risk, civilization and institutional decay and collapse as well as progress, collective action problems, social organization theories, and the relevant domains in philosophy and science.

For Show Notes and Transcript visit: https://www.thegreatsimplification.com/episode/05-daniel-schmactenberger

Denne episoden er hentet fra en åpen RSS-feed og er ikke publisert av Podme. Den kan derfor inneholde annonser.

Episoder(429)

A State of the World Address: The Climate Speech We'll Probably Never Hear | Frankly 160

A State of the World Address: The Climate Speech We'll Probably Never Hear | Frankly 160

On the heels of Climate Week, Nate poses a thought experiment: What would a world leader's speech sound like if the difficult truths underpinning global heating – which are politically unsayable due t...

25 Sep 15min

The Escalation Trap: Is America's Strategy in Iran Backfiring?

The Escalation Trap: Is America's Strategy in Iran Backfiring?

The United States, a global superpower for the last several decades, is now locked into a battle for control over the region with the bulk of the world's remaining fossil fuel reserves. Despite U.S. m...

23 Sep 1h 6min

The Real Work: Four Things We Can't Afford to Get Wrong | Frankly 159

The Real Work: Four Things We Can't Afford to Get Wrong | Frankly 159

This week, Nate zooms out from recent headlines about climbing diesel prices, a thinning U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve, and inflationary bond markets to ask the deeper question: what is the real wo...

18 Sep 33min

Radical Simplicity: The Opportunities of a World in Collapse with Sarah Wilson

Radical Simplicity: The Opportunities of a World in Collapse with Sarah Wilson

For years, the climate movement ran on the promise that, if we all rally hard enough, we could have it all: continue with our current system and save the planet. Yet the events of the past few decades...

16 Sep 1h 38min

The Human Predicament: What Would Change My Mind | Frankly 158

The Human Predicament: What Would Change My Mind | Frankly 158

This week's Frankly begins with a deceptively simple question Nate was asked in conversation: what would change his mind about The Great Simplification thesis? Nate uses the question as a jumping-off ...

11 Sep 18min

Banning Superintelligence: Are We Building Humanity's Replacement? with Roman Yampolskiy

Banning Superintelligence: Are We Building Humanity's Replacement? with Roman Yampolskiy

The world's leading AI companies tell us that superintelligence has a strong chance of leading to human extinction, while also promising that they will be able to control it, offering unlimited power ...

9 Sep 53min

Turning the Dials Back on Psychopathy: Decent People, Indecent System | Frankly 157

Turning the Dials Back on Psychopathy: Decent People, Indecent System | Frankly 157

This week's Frankly builds on Nate's recent conversation with systems theorist Greg Elliott, who came on the platform to discuss why our institutions themselves have become psychopathic and how that a...

4 Sep 38min

The Collapse of Our Mythology: Can Humanity Choose What's Next? with Charles Eisenstein

The Collapse of Our Mythology: Can Humanity Choose What's Next? with Charles Eisenstein

In this episode, Nate welcomes author and philosopher, Charles Eisenstein, for a long-requested conversation on the mythologies underneath civilization. For over two decades, Charles has argued that t...

2 Sep 1h 38min

Populært innen Vitenskap

fastlegen
romkapsel
tingenes-tilstand
jss
liberal-halvtime
forskningno
rekommandert
sinnsyn
tomprat-med-gunnar-tjomlid
villmarksliv
rss-paradigmepodden
fjellsportpodden
rss-nysgjerrige-norge
nordnorsk-historie
grunnstoffene
rss-rekommandert
tidlose-historier
rss-inn-til-kjernen-med-sunniva-rose
psykopoden
smart-forklart